Data centers and electricity prices by state
U.S. data centers used about 176 TWh in 2023, 4.4% of U.S. electricity, and LBNL projects 325 to 580 TWh (6.7% to 12.0%) by 2028. No open source publishes data-center electricity by state, so we use commercial-sector sales, where most data centers are billed, as a proxy: North Dakota grew 64% from 2019 to 2025 and Virginia added 30 TWh. The ten fastest-growing states saw home prices rise 26% over the same years, the ten slowest 40% (nominal). That is correlation across states, not proof that data centers raise or lower prices.
Find your state
Pick a state to see where it ranks.
- -9% to -3%
- -3% to +1%
- +1% to +5%
- +5% to +22%
- +22% to +64%
Commercial-sector sales, not data centers alone. Click a state for its page.
The national picture
LBNL estimates data centers used about 76 TWh in 2018 (1.9% of U.S. electricity) and 176 TWh in 2023. Annual growth was about 18% from 2018 to 2023, and the 2028 range of 325 to 580 TWh equals 74 to 132 GW of average demand.
U.S. data center electricity use, TWh: LBNL 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report, Dec 2024.
CSVWhat EIA and the grid operators say
- EIA's September 2026 Short-Term Energy Outlook has total U.S. retail sales at 4,058 billion kWh in 2025, 4,135 in 2026 and 4,211 in 2027, with commercial sales growing 3.3% in 2026 and 2.7% in 2027. It names data center development and manufacturing as the drivers. For 2026 the commercial sector is 63% of the growth in sales.
- EIA (Today in Energy, 5 May 2026) reports Virginia commercial sales up by nearly 30 million MWh from 2019 to 2025, much faster than any state except Texas. The Dominion zone summer peak reached 23,905 MW in 2025, 23% above 2019. Our own figure from the same sales series: +29.6 TWh.
- PJM's 2026 forecast adds 6,403 MW of large-load adjustments to the summer peak in 2026, 33,707 MW in 2030 and 67,370 MW in 2036, in table B-9; the Dominion zone alone is 20,451 MW in 2036.
Commercial sales growth, 51 states
By state, sortable
| Alabama | 23.1 | 23.0 | -0.3 | -0.1 | +1.3 | +28.5 | +28.4 | 26 | 16.10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 2.6 | 2.7 | +0.6 | +0.0 | +5.1 | +13.8 | +14.0 | 43 | 26.09 |
| Arizona | 29.4 | 37.5 | +27.6 | +8.1 | +17.5 | +23.3 | +23.3 | 41 | 15.32 |
| Arkansas | 11.9 | 11.9 | -0.4 | -0.0 | +10.1 | +31.0 | +19.7 | 22 | 12.84 |
| California | 114.3 | 113.5 | -0.7 | -0.8 | -5.0 | +69.9 | +63.6 | 48 | 32.54 |
| Colorado | 21.1 | 20.8 | -1.3 | -0.3 | +0.3 | +30.1 | +25.6 | 37 | 15.85 |
| Connecticut | 12.2 | 11.5 | -5.6 | -0.7 | -1.2 | +34.3 | +37.6 | 42 | 29.38 |
| Delaware | 4.4 | 4.3 | -3.3 | -0.1 | +1.0 | +36.5 | +34.9 | 37 | 17.13 |
| District of Columbia | 8.0 | 7.2 | -9.2 | -0.7 | -7.2 | +69.0 | +65.8 | 73 | 21.94 |
| Florida | 96.6 | 100.6 | +4.1 | +4.0 | +7.3 | +30.3 | +27.8 | 39 | 15.24 |
| Georgia | 47.4 | 56.9 | +20.1 | +9.5 | +10.3 | +25.3 | +22.0 | 37 | 14.73 |
| Hawaii | 3.1 | 2.8 | -7.9 | -0.2 | -3.3 | +26.6 | +24.4 | 31 | 40.59 |
| Idaho | 6.4 | 7.0 | +9.1 | +0.6 | +11.7 | +19.5 | +23.4 | 26 | 11.82 |
| Illinois | 49.3 | 46.3 | -5.9 | -2.9 | -2.1 | +35.8 | +43.7 | 34 | 17.69 |
| Indiana | 23.5 | 25.5 | +8.5 | +2.0 | +1.4 | +29.0 | +26.8 | 25 | 16.23 |
| Iowa | 12.3 | 13.3 | +8.1 | +1.0 | +14.7 | +10.1 | +7.5 | 23 | 13.72 |
| Kansas | 15.9 | 16.2 | +1.8 | +0.3 | +2.0 | +14.6 | +12.3 | 39 | 14.56 |
| Kentucky | 19.6 | 20.6 | +4.9 | +1.0 | +0.8 | +22.6 | +22.5 | 27 | 13.24 |
| Louisiana | 24.3 | 23.9 | -1.6 | -0.4 | +5.3 | +28.3 | +23.2 | 24 | 12.57 |
| Maine | 4.1 | 4.0 | -2.9 | -0.1 | -5.9 | +55.3 | +62.5 | 36 | 27.78 |
| Maryland | 28.9 | 27.6 | -4.6 | -1.3 | -1.7 | +48.5 | +49.7 | 47 | 19.48 |
| Massachusetts | 25.3 | 24.6 | -2.9 | -0.7 | +0.9 | +39.1 | +38.9 | 48 | 30.48 |
| Michigan | 37.9 | 37.4 | -1.2 | -0.4 | -1.1 | +27.1 | +27.4 | 37 | 20.01 |
| Minnesota | 22.9 | 23.2 | +1.2 | +0.3 | -1.8 | +21.3 | +22.7 | 35 | 15.82 |
| Mississippi | 14.2 | 14.3 | +0.7 | +0.1 | +1.3 | +24.5 | +24.7 | 29 | 14.03 |
| Missouri | 30.1 | 30.3 | +0.7 | +0.2 | +1.6 | +21.1 | +19.5 | 38 | 13.49 |
| Montana | 5.0 | 5.1 | +3.9 | +0.2 | +0.3 | +16.6 | +20.8 | 33 | 12.98 |
| Nebraska | 9.5 | 14.7 | +55.3 | +5.2 | +23.8 | +14.6 | +5.2 | 39 | 12.34 |
| Nevada | 11.7 | 14.2 | +21.1 | +2.5 | +7.7 | +9.6 | +17.4 | 36 | 13.15 |
| New Hampshire | 4.3 | 4.1 | -3.1 | -0.1 | +3.7 | +22.5 | +25.9 | 37 | 24.56 |
| New Jersey | 38.0 | 36.5 | -3.9 | -1.5 | -1.3 | +42.8 | +40.4 | 50 | 22.63 |
| New Mexico | 9.0 | 9.3 | +2.5 | +0.2 | +26.9 | +20.5 | +6.3 | 29 | 15.08 |
| New York | 75.1 | 71.9 | -4.3 | -3.2 | -1.6 | +47.1 | +50.8 | 51 | 26.39 |
| North Carolina | 49.2 | 50.2 | +2.2 | +1.1 | +3.0 | +22.8 | +22.0 | 36 | 14.02 |
| North Dakota | 7.0 | 11.5 | +63.6 | +4.5 | +40.7 | +14.7 | -7.3 | 38 | 11.81 |
| Ohio | 46.0 | 57.8 | +25.5 | +11.7 | +9.0 | +37.0 | +29.7 | 36 | 16.96 |
| Oklahoma | 20.1 | 27.7 | +37.8 | +7.6 | +15.9 | +28.5 | +20.9 | 37 | 13.12 |
| Oregon | 16.4 | 25.5 | +55.4 | +9.1 | +22.2 | +39.6 | +30.6 | 41 | 15.37 |
| Pennsylvania | 40.1 | 40.2 | +0.0 | +0.0 | -1.5 | +39.9 | +43.8 | 28 | 19.30 |
| Rhode Island | 3.6 | 3.6 | -0.8 | -0.0 | +0.8 | +35.6 | +39.9 | 49 | 29.46 |
| South Carolina | 22.2 | 27.0 | +21.8 | +4.8 | +6.7 | +15.2 | +14.3 | 32 | 14.96 |
| South Dakota | 4.9 | 5.3 | +8.3 | +0.4 | +7.3 | +15.8 | +14.0 | 38 | 13.38 |
| Tennessee | 36.2 | 36.5 | +1.0 | +0.4 | +6.7 | +21.3 | +19.4 | 34 | 13.18 |
| Texas | 142.0 | 173.8 | +22.4 | +31.8 | +21.1 | +31.5 | +18.4 | 33 | 15.47 |
| Utah | 11.9 | 14.7 | +24.0 | +2.9 | +12.6 | +25.7 | +29.5 | 42 | 13.07 |
| Vermont | 1.9 | 2.0 | +2.3 | +0.0 | +0.8 | +29.4 | +26.2 | 36 | 22.92 |
| Virginia | 54.0 | 83.6 | +54.9 | +29.6 | +22.1 | +26.6 | +19.9 | 58 | 15.28 |
| Washington | 29.3 | 33.6 | +15.0 | +4.4 | -0.0 | +35.0 | +37.6 | 37 | 13.11 |
| West Virginia | 7.6 | 8.0 | +6.0 | +0.5 | +1.3 | +37.0 | +34.3 | 24 | 15.41 |
| Wisconsin | 23.5 | 23.8 | +1.2 | +0.3 | +1.5 | +28.1 | +25.2 | 34 | 18.16 |
| Wyoming | 3.6 | 5.7 | +58.9 | +2.1 | +3.4 | +19.7 | +20.4 | 33 | 13.38 |
51 places, 2019 and 2025, nominal prices: EIA retail sales (EIA-861 based, annual), computed 6 Oct 2026.
CSVDo prices move with the load growth?
Across 51 states the correlation between commercial sales growth and the change in home prices from 2019 to 2025 is r = -0.32. The ten fastest-growing states averaged +26% in home prices and the ten slowest +40%. A weak or moderate r says the two do not line up neatly; it does not say data centers help or hurt bills.
51 states: EIA retail sales (EIA-861 based, annual), computed 6 Oct 2026.
CSVWhere PJM expects large new loads
PJM adds large-load adjustments (mostly data centers) to the summer peak forecast by zone. Zones are utility areas and can cross state lines; the state label is our mapping.
| DOM | VA (plus NC part) | 3,429 | 10,135 | 20,451 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEP | OH/VA/WV/IN/KY/MI/TN (multi-state) | 1,913 | 7,918 | 17,115 |
| COMED | IL | 478 | 4,838 | 10,405 |
| PL | PA | 189 | 4,996 | 6,279 |
| APS | WV/MD/PA/VA (multi-state) | 165 | 1,213 | 2,624 |
| PS | NJ | 72 | 1,194 | 2,372 |
| DAYTON | OH | 0 | 954 | 2,241 |
| ATSI | OH | 132 | 1,129 | 2,211 |
| PECO | PA | 17 | 824 | 1,697 |
| PEPCO | DC/MD | 0 | 142 | 1,064 |
| BGE | MD | 18 | 176 | 355 |
| JCPL | NJ | 0 | 77 | 245 |
| METED | PA | 0 | 75 | 233 |
| DLCO | PA | 0 | 46 | 87 |
top 14 zones, summer peak adjustments: PJM 2026 Load Forecast Report, table B-9, published 14 Jan 2026.
CSVHow states are changing the rules
The Edison Electric Institute counts 25 states have approved at least one large load tariff, and another 7 states have pending large load tariffs. (industry association source). A few examples with dockets:
| State | Utility and tariff | Docket | Date | What it does, as summarised in the source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OH | AEP Ohio data center tariff | 24-0508-EL-ATA | 2025-07-09 | PUCO order adopted settlement: AEP Ohio to file data center tariff and lift connection moratorium. EEI: new data centers >25 MW pay for at least 85% of expected monthly energy even if unused. |
| VA | Dominion GS-5 rate class (and minimum demand/contract terms) | PUR-2025-00058 | 2025-11-25 (final order; GS-5 effective 2027-01-01 per secondary source) | Approved in Dominion rate review: GS-5 class for load >=25 MW and load factor >=75%; minimum demand charges and contract terms. (85%/14-year detail from WebSearch only, not verified.) |
| VA | Appalachian Power large power revisions | PUR-2025-00057 | see EEI | Revisions to Large Power Service schedule for new large additions. |
| IN | I&M Industrial Power (I.P.) large load modifications | 46097 | 2025-02-19 (order file ord_46097_021925) | IURC approval of I&M tariff modifications for large loads (EEI listing). Terms (70 MW/150 MW threshold, 12-year term, 80% min demand) per WebSearch snippet only. |
| GA | Georgia Power large load rule amendments (>=100 MW) | 44280 | see EEI | Minimum billing requirements and longer contract terms for expected peak demand >=100 MW. |
| TX | El Paso Electric / SWEPCO / large load tariffs at PUCT | 57568; 56903; 58796; 59611 | 2026 | Multiple PUCT dockets: 57568, 56903, 58796 (SWEPCO ES-LL, >=75 MW), 59611 (EPE Schedule 27 HLFLP, >=75 MW, >=85% LF). |
| PA | PA PUC Large Load Tariff Framework | M-2025-3054271; R-2025-3057164 | 2026-04 | Model framework for customers >50 MW individually or 100 MW aggregate; PPL settlement includes large load tariff. |
| FL | FPL LLCS-1 / LLCS-2 large load contract service | 20250011 | effective 2026-01-01 | For new load >=50 MW and >=85% load factor; take-or-pay, exit fees, collateral. |
| MO/KS | Evergy Large Load Power Service (LLPS) | EO-2025-0154; 25-EKME-315-TAR | see EEI | Missouri LLPS for 75 MW minimum demand; Kansas Evergy large load plan approved. |
| OR | PGE large load rate class | UM 2377 | 2026-05 | Oregon PUC approved with modifications a new large load class. |
| IL | ComEd Rider DE / terms revisions | 25-0679/25-0677 | see EEI | Clarified requirements for large load service requests. |
| WI | We Energies Very Large Customer tariff | 6630-TE-113 | see EEI | VLC tariff and Bespoke Resources Tariff approved by PSCW. |
| MD | Maryland large load rate schedule filings (Next Generation Energy Act) | PC72 | 2026-09-01 | Potomac Edison and Exelon MD utilities filed large load schedule proposals. |
| OH | FirstEnergy Ohio Data Center Tariff (pending) | 26-0697-EL-ATA | 2026-06 | Pending DCT filing; also Duke Energy Ohio Rate DC (26-0755) and AES Ohio settlement. |
14 tariffs: EEI Large Load Projects and Tariffs (Sept 2026); PUCO, retrieved 2 Oct 2026.
CSVWhat the open data does not show
- Data center electricity by state. The LBNL report ranks Virginia first, then California and Texas, but publishes no state table. We did not find an open dataset of data-center load by state.
- ISO queues by state. ERCOT, MISO, SPP, CAISO and NYISO publish large-load interconnection queues, but their sites blocked our automatic access, so we did not read or copy any figure from them. PJM's forecast tables were readable and are shown above.
- Cause and effect on prices. Prices also reflect fuel costs, wires and storm spending, rate cases and each state's regulation. Nothing here isolates the effect of data centers.
How we counted
Commercial sales: EIA retail sales by state, annual 2019 and 2025, in million kWh converted to TWh. Commercial customers include offices, shops, hospitals and data centers, so growth can come from other users; a state with several large data centers will show it, one with many small ones will not. Price change is the percent change of EIA's average residential price between 2019 and 2025, nominal and not adjusted for inflation. Correlation across 51 places: commercial growth against home price change r = -0.32; all-sector sales growth against home price change r = -0.46. Summed over these 51 places, commercial sales went from 1,361 to 1,493 TWh (+9.7%) on our sums.
Sources, dates and licences
| Source | Data period | Retrieved | Licence |
|---|---|---|---|
| LBNL 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report | 2014 to 2028 | 2 Oct 2026 | Public report; figures quoted with attribution |
| EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026 | 2025 to 2027 | 2 Oct 2026 | U.S. government data, public domain; cite EIA |
| EIA Today in Energy: Commercial electricity sales have soared in Virginia | published 5 May 2026 | 2 Oct 2026 | U.S. government data, public domain; cite EIA |
| EIA annual and monthly retail sales (state, sector) | 2019 and 2025 | 1 Oct 2026 | U.S. government data, public domain; cite EIA |
| PJM 2026 Load Forecast Report and tables | forecast to 2036 | 2 Oct 2026 | PJM public report; figures quoted with attribution |
| Edison Electric Institute: Large Load Projects and Tariffs | published 11 Sep 2026 | 2 Oct 2026 | Industry association; cited only |
| Ohio PUCO bulletin on AEP Ohio data center tariff | 9 Jul 2025 | 2 Oct 2026 | State agency, public |
Last verified: 6 Oct 2026.
More
- Fastest rising electricity prices
- Cheapest electricity by state
- State utility commissions and rate cases
- Why prices differ by state
Questions
How much electricity do data centers use?
LBNL estimates about 176 TWh in 2023, 4.4% of U.S. electricity, up from about 76 TWh in 2018. Its 2028 range is 325 to 580 TWh.
Which states use the most electricity for data centers?
LBNL names Virginia first, then California and Texas, but gives no state table. We found no open state-level dataset.
Which states have the fastest commercial load growth?
By percent, North Dakota (+64%), Wyoming (+59%) and Oregon (+55%) from 2019 to 2025; by TWh added, Texas (+31.8 TWh).
Do data centers raise my electricity bill?
This page cannot say. Across states, commercial growth and home price change correlate at r = -0.32. Many things move prices, and regulators in several states are writing special tariffs so large new loads pay their own costs.
Why use commercial sales as a proxy?
Most data centers are billed as commercial customers, and EIA publishes commercial sales by state every year. The proxy also includes offices, stores and other users, so it overstates data-center growth in some states and misses it in others.
What is a large-load tariff?
A rate class for very large new customers, often with minimum payments and long contracts. EEI counts 25 states have approved at least one large load tariff, and another 7 states have pending large load tariffs.
What does PJM forecast?
PJM's 2026 forecast adds 67,370 MW of large-load adjustments to the summer peak by 2036, with the Dominion zone at 20,451 MW.
What do EIA's forecasts say?
The September 2026 STEO has commercial sales up 3.3% in 2026 and 2.7% in 2027, and names data centers as a driver.
Why are ERCOT and MISO queue numbers missing?
Their websites blocked our automated access on 2 Oct 2026, and we do not publish figures we could not read at the source.