Electric Consumer

Editor: Katerine G., Editor & Data Researcher · Research & publishing: Electric Consumer Editorial Team · Data retrieved · Sources named on this page: EIA-861, EIA retail sales · How we got these numbers · Report an error

Investor-owned, municipal and cooperative utilities: who serves you and what they charge

35 of 36states where municipal utilities charge homes less than investor-owned ones in the same state, 2024

Cooperatives are below investor-owned prices in 30 of 41 states where both can be compared. The median municipal gap is -14% and the median cooperative gap -5%. Investor-owned utilities serve 69% of U.S. homes in this data; municipal 10%, cooperative 13%. Each gap compares average prices of customer groups inside one state. It is not what one household would save, and it does not say why prices differ.

Share served by investor-owned utilities

Share of residential customers served by investor-owned utilities, by state, 2024New Mexico: 78%Texas: 9%Kentucky: 54%Ohio: 89%Georgia: 52%Arkansas: 54%Oregon: 77%Pennsylvania: 97%Missouri: 67%North Carolina: 69%Utah: 81%Virginia: 80%Wyoming: 71%West Virginia: 100%New York: 85%Indiana: 78%Kansas: 80%Idaho: 87%Nevada: 96%Illinois: 93%Vermont: 81%New Jersey: 99%Minnesota: 60%Maryland: 90%Iowa: 84%Hawaii: 93%New Hampshire: 88%Rhode Island: 99%Connecticut: 96%Montana: 73%Arizona: 57%Nebraska: 0%Washington: 44%South Dakota: 64%California: 79%Alabama: 57%Wisconsin: 86%Mississippi: 42%Colorado: 58%Oklahoma: 68%Tennessee: 1%Louisiana: 76%Michigan: 89%Massachusetts: 91%Florida: 75%Alaska: 8%North Dakota: 56%South Carolina: 56%Maine: 98%Delaware: 66%District of Columbia: 100%
  • 0% to 56%
  • 56% to 71%
  • 71% to 81%
  • 81% to 93%
  • 93% to 100%

Share of residential customers in EIA-861 2024 whose wires utility is investor-owned. Darker is higher: District of Columbia 100%, Nebraska 0%. The rest are municipal, cooperative and other public utilities and, in Texas, competitive suppliers. Click a state for its page.

Who serves U.S. homes: many small utilities, a few large ones

Of 3,061 utilities of the five main types, 174 are investor-owned (6%) and they serve 69% of residential customers. Cooperatives are 29% of utilities and serve 13%; municipal utilities are 60% and serve 10%. Customer counts cover utilities that report residential detail; the many small utilities that file the short EIA form add utilities to the count but not to the customer column.

U.S. utilities and residential customers by type, EIA-861 2024
Utility typeUtilities listedShare of utilitiesResidential customersShare of customers
Investor-owned1746%95,684,66068.7%
Municipal1,82360%13,234,1599.5%
Cooperative89529%18,367,55013.2%
Political subdivision1395%3,719,2632.7%
State and federal301%1,295,0890.9%

% of residential customers

  • Investor-owned68.7
  • Municipal9.5
  • Cooperative13.2
  • Political subdivision2.7
  • State and federal0.9

All states in one table

Residential customers and prices by utility type, 50 states and DC, 2024
Alabama57.021.321.70.016.811.914.5-29-14097
Alaska7.72.489.90.016.3not shown25.8not shown+58092
Arizona57.00.56.036.516.3not shown13.0not shown-20099
Arkansas53.712.433.90.012.79.512.7-25+0098
California78.614.70.06.635.123.0not shown-35not shown3899
Colorado58.415.626.00.015.213.815.0-9-1097
Connecticut96.43.60.00.029.518.6not shown-37not shown1999
Delaware66.110.923.00.017.216.514.2-4-17696
District of Columbia100.00.00.00.016.6not shownnot shownnot shownnot shown9100
Florida75.113.211.70.014.413.113.3-9-80100
Georgia52.54.542.80.215.512.912.8-17-18097
Hawaii93.30.06.70.044.1not shown41.3not shown-60100
Idaho87.43.49.20.011.89.211.0-21-6096
Illinois93.03.04.00.015.112.715.9-16+52697
Indiana77.75.017.20.014.812.115.1-18+2095
Iowa84.54.710.80.013.611.813.4-13-1086
Kansas80.58.511.00.013.914.313.7+3-1085
Kentucky54.07.238.80.012.612.513.1-1+4099
Louisiana76.05.118.80.011.710.012.1-15+3098
Maine97.70.91.50.024.3not shownnot shownnot shownnot shown999
Maryland90.41.08.70.018.09.815.2-45-1612100
Massachusetts90.89.20.00.032.216.5not shown-49not shown5896
Michigan88.84.76.50.019.616.518.4-16-6098
Minnesota60.48.331.30.016.614.714.6-11-12090
Mississippi41.66.651.90.013.611.913.4-12-1097
Missouri66.59.823.60.012.912.712.8-1-1093
Montana72.60.024.03.414.1not shown10.7not shown-25086
Nebraska0.027.00.672.4not shown11.0not shownnot shownnot shown084
Nevada95.70.52.61.215.2not shown14.2not shown-6099
New Hampshire88.50.011.50.022.7not shown23.8not shown+53698
New Jersey99.40.60.00.019.217.8not shown-7not shown599
New Mexico77.84.916.21.113.912.915.1-7+8095
New York85.00.90.014.124.57.7not shown-68not shown999
North Carolina68.69.421.80.114.612.013.7-18-6097
North Dakota55.50.044.50.011.8not shown11.2not shown-5094
Ohio89.24.86.10.017.213.216.2-23-66197
Oklahoma68.55.226.30.012.212.112.4-1+1094
Oregon77.28.28.85.916.311.011.0-32-33096
Pennsylvania96.70.23.10.017.3not shown15.6not shown-102498
Rhode Island98.71.00.00.428.3not shownnot shownnot shownnot shown25100
South Carolina56.54.631.57.414.412.714.6-11+1097
South Dakota64.59.326.00.313.410.513.1-22-2080
Tennessee1.466.032.60.012.812.412.4-3-30100
Texas9.214.819.80.013.312.612.7-6-5099
Utah80.614.34.60.512.511.59.5-8-25092
Vermont80.86.412.80.022.1not shown23.3not shown+5087
Virginia80.12.617.10.214.613.213.8-10-5098
Washington43.921.04.530.613.812.510.1-9-27098
West Virginia100.00.00.00.015.1not shownnot shownnot shownnot shown099
Wisconsin86.48.15.50.017.912.416.1-31-10094
Wyoming71.05.723.30.013.9not shown9.3not shown-33086

Download state by type data as CSV Download all utilities as CSV

Click a header to sort. "Not shown" means the type has fewer than 20,000 bundled residential customers with a price in that state. Prices are bundled-service averages, so in states with energy-only suppliers they describe customers served by their utility.

Where the gaps are largest

Eight states with the biggest discount and five with the highest premium, municipal utilities against investor-owned in the same state; 36 states are comparable.

% difference in average residential price, municipal vs investor-owned, 2024

  1. 1New York-68%
  2. 2Massachusetts-49%
  3. 3Maryland-45%
  4. 4Connecticut-37%
  5. 5California-35%
  6. 6Oregon-32%
  7. 7Wisconsin-31%
  8. 8Alabama-29%
  9. 9Tennessee-3%
  10. 10Missouri-1%
  11. 11Oklahoma-1%
  12. 12Kentucky-1%
  13. 13Kansas+3%

Cooperatives: 30 of 41 states below investor-owned; largest premium +58% in Alaska, largest discount -33% in Wyoming. See the table for every state.

Cooperative price gaps and rural territory

Cooperative price gap against rurality difference, 41 states-40-200204060-100-50050100Alabama: 5, -14Alaska: -50, 58AKArizona: 10, -20Arkansas: -15, 0Colorado: -25, -1Delaware: 17, -17Florida: -3, -8Georgia: -24, -18Hawaii: 81, -6HIIdaho: 4, -6Illinois: 25, 5Indiana: -0, 2Iowa: -11, -1Kansas: 27, -1Kentucky: 26, 4Louisiana: -11, 3Maryland: 6, -16Michigan: 21, -6Minnesota: -11, -12Mississippi: -6, -1Missouri: -1, -1Montana: 1, -25Nevada: 22, -6New Hampshire: 11, 5New Mexico: -2, 8North Carolina: 6, -6North Dakota: 27, -5Ohio: 12, -6Oklahoma: -11, 1Oregon: 27, -33Pennsylvania: 23, -10South Carolina: 3, 1South Dakota: 5, -2Tennessee: 40, -3Texas: 4, -5Utah: 14, -25Vermont: -22, 5Virginia: -4, -5Washington: -1, -27Wisconsin: 25, -10Wyoming: 9, -33WYcooperative territory nonmetro share minus investor-owned, percentage pointscooperative price vs investor-owned, %

Across 41 states the correlation is r = -0.37, a moderate negative link. Cooperatives serve more rural counties than investor-owned utilities in most states, yet the gap varies in sign and size, so the two do not line up state by state. Taxes, power supply contracts, debt, customer density, usage and what each price includes also differ and are not measured here. The rurality figure is the share of listed counties that are nonmetro, not customers.

Who serves me, and how do they compare?

  • Pick a utility.

What this means for you

  • Find your utility's name on your bill or in the map on your state page. Its type decides who sets its rates: in many states a state commission reviews investor-owned rates, while municipal and cooperative rates are often set by a city council or a member-elected board, with some states regulating them too.
  • You usually cannot switch your wires utility, so use the comparison to see how your bill sits against your state's other types, then check your own rate schedule.
  • A lower average price at a cooperative or municipal utility does not mean your bill would drop if you moved to one: usage, fixed charges, territory and taxes differ.
  • If you pay a competitive supplier, compare its rate with your utility's default price on your bill; the pages on your state list how many customers buy that way.

How we measure it

Source: EIA-861 for 2024, sheet Sales_Ult_Cust, residential columns only. Customers served are the wires utility's bundled customers (Part A) plus delivery-only customers (Part C); in Texas, where the wires companies file no sales sheet, the retail electric providers' bundled customers (Part D). Energy-only customers (Part B, mostly competitive suppliers and community choice programs) are shown as a share and not added, since the same households already appear under their wires utility. Adjustment rows (utility number 99999) and behind-the-meter rows are dropped. Price is revenue divided by sales across a type's bundled residential service, with fixed charges included, so it is an average price and not a rate. A type enters a within-state comparison only with 20,000+ bundled residential customers. Coverage compares our customer total with EIA's published 2024 residential customer count for the state. Rurality: each utility's listed service-territory counties (EIA Service_Territory) are matched by state and county name to USDA's 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes; codes 4 to 9 are nonmetro. 49 of 11,776 territory rows could not be matched (Connecticut planning-region codes and renamed Alaska areas) and are left out. Utility type is the type in EIA's own filing.

What this does not show: why prices differ, what a household would pay at another utility, wholesale cost, taxes and fees, or the quality of service. Averages for small types in a state rest on a few utilities.

Browse by state

Sources

Sources, periods, retrieval dates and file checksums for the utility-type pages
SourcePeriodRetrievedSHA-256 (first 12)
EIA, Annual Electric Power Industry Report (Form EIA-861), 2024 data: Sales_Ult_Cust, Utility_Data, Short_Form, Service_Territory2024 data yearfile set dated 6 Oct 2025; downloaded to our archive 1 Oct 202677ce49c60ac5
USDA Economic Research Service, Rural-Urban Continuum Codes2023 codes (last updated 22 Jan 2024)retrieved 7 Oct 2026ec455ee2a8bc
EIA Open Data API, retail-sales2024 residential customers, used for the coverage figure onlycached copy, 7 Oct 2026237b6f98d5f7

Downloads: state by type CSV, all utilities CSV. Method on the hub page.

Questions

Are cooperative and municipal utilities cheaper than investor-owned ones?

In EIA-861 2024 data municipal utilities had a lower average residential price than investor-owned ones in 35 of 36 states where both can be compared (median -14%), and cooperatives in 30 of 41 (median -5%). These compare customer groups with different usage and territory and do not prove a cost advantage.

Which type of utility serves the most homes?

Investor-owned utilities: 69% of residential customers in the file, against 10% municipal and 13% cooperative.

How do I know what type my utility is?

Look up its name on your state page here; the type is the one the utility reports to EIA. Its bill or website usually states it too.

Can I pick a different utility?

Usually not. Your wires utility follows your address. In some states you can buy energy from a competitive supplier while the local utility still delivers it.

Why are some states missing a price for a type?

A type needs 20,000+ bundled residential customers with a published price in the state to be shown. Smaller groups are too sensitive to a single utility.

Share this page

35 of 36 states where municipal utilities charge homes less than investor-owned ones in the same state, 2024

Cite this page

Underlying data are U.S. government works (EIA, Census Bureau). Our tables and charts: CC BY 4.0, credit Electric Consumer. The access date fills in when you open this page.

APA

Electric Consumer. (2026). Utility types by state: municipal cheaper in 35 of 36 states, 2024. Data as of 7 October 2026. Retrieved [date accessed], from https://electricconsumer.org/ownership/

MLA

Electric Consumer. “Utility types by state: municipal cheaper in 35 of 36 states, 2024.” Electric Consumer, data as of 7 October 2026, https://electricconsumer.org/ownership/index.html. Accessed [date accessed].

Chicago

Electric Consumer. “Utility types by state: municipal cheaper in 35 of 36 states, 2024.” Data as of 7 October 2026. Accessed [date accessed]. https://electricconsumer.org/ownership/index.html.

BibTeX

@misc{usedata_ownership_index,
  author = "Electric Consumer",
  title = {Utility types by state: municipal cheaper in 35 of 36 states, 2024},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://electricconsumer.org/ownership/},
  note = {Data as of 7 October 2026. Accessed [date accessed]}
}
Embed this chart or number

Free to use. No tracking, no scripts. Each embed links back to this site.

Charts on this page (SVG)

Copies a self-contained SVG with the source and a link to this page inside the image.