Electric Consumer

Editor: Katerine G., Editor & Data Researcher · Research & publishing: Electric Consumer Editorial Team · Data retrieved · Sources named on this page: EIA-861 · How we got these numbers · Report an error

Utility report card: smart meters, time-based rates and efficiency programs

92%of U.S. residential meters were smart meters (AMI) in 2024; 286 of 890 utilities with 10,000+ residential customers offer a time-based rate

684 of 803 utilities with 10,000+ residential meters have smart meters on at least 90% of homes and 48 on under 10%. Utilities spent $124.2 per customer on efficiency programs and reported 77 watts of actual peak savings per customer through demand response. Four separate rankings follow; they are not combined into one grade.

1. Smart meters: share of residential meters that are AMI

AMI is the two-way type of smart meter. U.S. median utility: 100%, and 505 of 803 utilities are at 100%, so the top of this list is a tie and is ordered by size. A low AMI share does not mean no automatic reading: many utilities read meters automatically with older AMR meters, shown in the next column. By type, median share (utilities): cooperative 100% (433); municipal 100% (198); investor owned 99% (139); political subdivision 100% (30).

Largest 25 utilities at 100%

25 largest utilities with smart meters on every residential meter
UtilityStateTypeResidential metersSmart (AMI), %Smart or older automatic (AMI+AMR), %Customers with daily digital access
PECO Energy CoPAInvestor Owned1,550,968100.0%——
Alabama Power CoALInvestor Owned1,332,513100.0%—1,330,782
PPL Electric Utilities CorpPAInvestor Owned1,306,592100.0%—1,295,883
Portland General Electric CoORInvestor Owned828,857100.0%——
Austin EnergyTXMunicipal507,291100.0%100.0%507,291
JEAFLMunicipal470,564100.0%—470,564
Nashville Electric ServiceTNMunicipal417,640100.0%100.0%0
Middle Tennessee E M CTNCooperative307,370100.0%100.0%207,765
Lee County Electric Coop, Inc - (FL)FLCooperative231,142100.0%100.0%223,863
City of Huntsville - (AL)ALMunicipal197,537100.0%100.0%197,537
Knoxville Utilities BoardTNMunicipal193,707100.0%100.0%193,707
CORE Electric CooperativeCOCooperative165,087100.0%——
City of Chattanooga - (TN)TNMunicipal164,417100.0%100.0%0
Southern Indiana Gas & Elec CoINInvestor Owned140,114100.0%——
Walton Electric Member CorpGACooperative130,781100.0%—130,781
Magic Valley Electric Coop IncTXCooperative126,402100.0%—126,402
Great Lakes Energy CoopMICooperative120,645100.0%—120,645
Berkeley Electric Coop IncSCCooperative117,706100.0%—115,117
City of Tallahassee - (FL)FLMunicipal105,267100.0%——
Snapping Shoals El Member CorpGACooperative105,253100.0%—105,253
Volunteer Electric CoopTNCooperative104,387100.0%100.0%104,387
Modesto Irrigation DistrictCAPolitical Subdivision103,650100.0%——
Carroll Electric Coop Corp - (AR)ARCooperative101,154100.0%—68,988
Cumberland Elec Member CorpTNCooperative100,585100.0%100.0%100,585
First Electric Coop CorpARCooperative95,175100.0%—95,175

Lowest 25

25 utilities with the lowest smart-meter share
UtilityStateTypeResidential metersSmart (AMI), %Smart or older automatic (AMI+AMR), %Customers with daily digital access
Monongahela Power CoWVInvestor Owned340,5950.0%26.5%0
The Potomac Edison CompanyMDInvestor Owned259,1280.0%16.7%0
The Potomac Edison CompanyWVInvestor Owned138,2750.0%19.6%0
Lincoln Electric SystemNEMunicipal134,6340.0%100.0%—
Kentucky Power CoKYInvestor Owned131,2340.0%99.9%0
Avista CorpIDInvestor Owned122,7350.0%100.0%—
Gainesville Regional UtilitiesFLMunicipal92,9680.0%——
City of Cleveland - (OH)OHMunicipal64,9140.0%100.0%—
UGI Utilities, IncPAInvestor Owned55,8020.0%98.6%—
Brownsville Public Utilities BoardTXMunicipal50,5940.0%20.7%—
Town of High PointNCMunicipal38,0790.0%100.0%—
Cloverland Electric Co-opMICooperative36,1240.0%100.0%0
City of Farmington - (NM)NMMunicipal35,9900.0%51.2%—
Ozark Border Electric CoopMOCooperative33,2290.0%100.0%33,229
City of Greeneville - (TN)TNMunicipal32,4590.0%100.0%32,388
Central Electric Power Assn - (MS)MSCooperative30,9050.0%0.0%0
Northcentral Mississippi E P AMSCooperative29,1360.0%100.0%29,136
Florida Public Utilities CoFLInvestor Owned28,8750.0%51.3%—
City of Moorhead - (MN)MNMunicipal18,8330.0%99.5%0
Northern Lights, IncIDCooperative18,5110.0%100.0%—
City of Oak RidgeTNMunicipal15,4970.0%0.0%0
City of St Charles - (IL)ILMunicipal14,1810.0%0.0%0
City of Gillette - (WY)WYMunicipal14,0620.0%98.4%—
Newberry Electric Coop, IncSCCooperative13,1410.0%99.9%—
Tri-State Electric Member CorpGACooperative13,1230.0%100.0%13,123

Download all 803 utilities as CSV

Utilities with fewer than 10,000 residential meters are left out. Ties are ordered by the number of meters. A share over 100% in a filing is left blank.

2. Time-based pricing: who offers it and how many customers are on it

TOU is time-of-use; RTP real-time; VPP variable peak; CPP critical peak; CPR critical peak rebate. 286 of 890 utilities with 10,000+ residential customers report at least one residential program. 17 of the listed utilities show 100% enrolled, which usually means a time-of-use rate is the standard residential rate; EIA's count of enrolled customers is the utility's own.

Share of utilities offering time-based residential pricing by utility type
Utility typeUtilities (10,000+ residential)Offer a programShare offering
Cooperative45311926%
Municipal2434418%
Investor Owned15411675%
Political Subdivision35514%

Highest enrolled share, 25 utilities

25 utilities with the highest share of residential customers on time-based rates
UtilityStateTypeResidential customersPrograms reportedEnrolled residential customersEnrolled, % of residential
Public Service Co of OklahomaOKInvestor Owned501,093TOU501,093100.0%
Southwestern Electric Power CoTXInvestor Owned156,271TOU156,271100.0%
Southwestern Electric Power CoARInvestor Owned108,102TOU108,102100.0%
Fayetteville Public Works CommissionNCMunicipal75,987TOU75,987100.0%
Hendricks County Rural E M CINCooperative37,638TOU37,638100.0%
Linn County RECIACooperative30,323TOU30,323100.0%
Eastern Iowa Light & Power CoopIACooperative20,749TOU20,749100.0%
Capital Electric Coop, IncNDCooperative19,530TOU, CPP19,530100.0%
NineStar ConnectINCooperative17,770TOU17,770100.0%
Grand Valley PowerCOCooperative17,268TOU17,268100.0%
Lorain-Medina R E C, IncOHCooperative15,234TOU15,234100.0%
Empire Electric Assn, IncCOCooperative12,899TOU12,899100.0%
Maquoketa Valley Rrl Elec CoopIACooperative11,051TOU11,051100.0%
Missoula Electric Coop, IncMTCooperative14,686TOU14,685100.0%
Southwestern Electric Power CoLAInvestor Owned207,011TOU206,89799.9%
City of Fort Collins - (CO)COMunicipal70,803TOU70,65699.8%
Flathead Electric Coop IncMTCooperative63,317TOU63,02199.5%
Empire District Electric CoMOInvestor Owned142,537TOU141,78499.5%
Hancock-Wood Electric Coop IncOHCooperative11,307TOU11,23199.3%
Consumers Energy Co - (MI)MIInvestor Owned1,657,843TOU, CPP, CPR1,642,36999.1%
Johnson County Rural E M CINCooperative28,279TOU27,53897.4%
Sacramento Municipal Util DistCAPolitical Subdivision592,557TOU, CPP576,47797.3%
Baltimore Gas & Electric CoMDInvestor Owned1,214,100CPR1,171,61596.5%
City of Lansing - (MI)MIMunicipal87,301TOU82,54394.5%
Evergy MetroMOInvestor Owned273,860TOU245,54789.7%

Download all 890 utilities as CSV

A utility that does not appear in EIA's dynamic-pricing sheet is counted as reporting no program; it may still have one it did not file. The state-level view is on the coverage ranking.

3. Efficiency programs: spending per customer

Customer incentives plus all other program costs reported for the year, over the utility's customers. 372 utilities with 10,000+ customers reported spending; median $17.5 per customer. Spending and savings are reported separately and may not describe the same programs, so read the two columns together.

Highest 25

25 utilities with the highest efficiency program spending per customer
UtilityStateTypeCustomersSpending per customer, $Saved per customer, kWhSpending, $ thousand
West River Electric Assn IncSDCooperative20,674$747.11.815,446
Public Service Elec & Gas CoNJInvestor Owned2,389,765$232.0265.9554,315
NSTAR Electric CompanyMAInvestor Owned1,526,558$223.6122.9341,388
Fitchburg Gas & Elec Light CoMAInvestor Owned30,884$162.8121.95,028
PacifiCorpWAInvestor Owned137,263$161.3296.922,135
The Narragansett Electric CoRIInvestor Owned514,663$157.7142.681,187
PUD No 1 of Chelan CountyWAPolitical Subdivision50,137$141.2233.87,081
Oklahoma Gas & Electric CoARInvestor Owned69,993$132.0447.79,239
Southern Maryland Elec Coop IncMDCooperative177,155$130.9457.523,198
Avista CorpIDInvestor Owned148,019$130.1224.119,254
Baltimore Gas & Electric CoMDInvestor Owned1,342,757$129.6363.7174,071
Liberty Utilities (Granite State ElectriNHInvestor Owned46,797$129.1175.26,042
The Potomac Edison CompanyMDInvestor Owned291,267$124.5412.536,276
Groton Dept of Utilities - (CT)CTMunicipal13,889$123.648.91,717
Delmarva PowerMDInvestor Owned215,111$121.1231.626,056
Jersey Central Power & Lt CoNJInvestor Owned1,171,837$118.4136.1138,722
Potomac Electric Power CoMDInvestor Owned603,429$117.3274.170,798
Avista CorpWAInvestor Owned274,115$115.2162.031,581
Otter Tail Power CoMNInvestor Owned63,326$109.8677.66,956
Consumers Energy Co - (MI)MIInvestor Owned1,894,492$106.1332.2200,988
Connecticut Light & Power CoCTInvestor Owned1,290,878$102.4101.5132,224
Ameren Illinois CompanyILInvestor Owned1,224,108$101.9295.4124,778
United Illuminating CoCTInvestor Owned345,877$99.996.734,569
Southwestern Public Service CoNMInvestor Owned127,672$98.0662.712,509
Puget Sound Energy IncWAInvestor Owned1,238,151$97.0208.5120,133

Download all 372 utilities as CSV

Savings are first-year energy savings from programs started in the reporting year. Utilities that reported no program are not in the table.

4. Demand response: peak demand actually cut

Demand response pays or asks customers to use less at peak times. 234 utilities with 10,000+ customers reported actual peak savings; median 75 watts per customer. Several of the highest are small cooperatives and public power districts, where one program with a few large customers weighs heavily.

Highest 25

25 utilities with the highest actual peak demand savings per customer
UtilityStateTypeCustomersActual peak savings per customer, wattsActual peak savings, MWPotential peak savings, MWEnrolled customers, all classes
Elkhorn Rural Public Pwr DistNEPolitical Subdivision10,2314,49646.093.01,641
Custer Public Power DistrictNEPolitical Subdivision11,0464,25547.083.01,877
Dawson Power DistrictNEPolitical Subdivision23,4613,38179.3101.14,737
Nodak Electric Coop IncNDCooperative21,3403,06565.4156.45,545
Woodruff Electric Coop CorpARCooperative20,0242,68153.791.54,013
Jackson Electric Coop, Inc - (TX)TXCooperative17,4022,41442.043.012
Wild Rice Electric Coop, IncMNCooperative14,8012,38135.2130.06,706
Otter Tail Power CoNDInvestor Owned59,1122,267134.0134.017,811
Cass County Elec Coop IncNDCooperative59,6872,017120.4445.99,225
Cedar Falls UtilitiesIAMunicipal20,2461,83337.137.14
West River Electric Assn IncSDCooperative20,6741,81037.453.25,483
Norris Public Power DistrictNEPolitical Subdivision27,7651,56043.367.51,697
PacifiCorpIDInvestor Owned90,7161,334121.0175.0111
Colquitt Electric Membership CorpGACooperative72,9781,22889.689.72,313
Beltrami Electric Coop, IncMNCooperative22,3641,21927.3219.27,519
Menard Electric CoopILCooperative10,9721,13812.525.01,317
City of Elk RiverMNMunicipal13,4661,04214.016.68
Loup River Public Power DistNEPolitical Subdivision20,76292419.224.5579
Medina Electric Coop, IncTXCooperative37,64589833.879.0744
MPD Electric CooperativeSCCooperative38,61287533.843.08
City of Hamilton - (OH)OHMunicipal29,89184625.325.316
Crisp County Power CommGAPolitical Subdivision12,09582710.012.02
Choctawhatche Elec Coop, IncFLCooperative66,47976651.051.066,479
Otter Tail Power CoSDInvestor Owned11,9597539.09.04,013
Shelby Electric Coop, Inc - (IL)ILCooperative10,0547517.514.21,033

Download all 234 utilities as CSV

The four measures by state

Utility report-card measures by state, 2024
Alabama96%1 of 284%$4.51390.0
Alaska88%2 of 540%$0.009.4
Arizona95%9 of 1275%$35.012590.9
Arkansas91%3 of 2114%$41.18012.3
California98%16 of 2564%$37.934129.1
Colorado94%13 of 2065%$40.520564.3
Connecticut92%2 of 540%$97.66561.4
Delaware100%2 of 450%$25,145.017328.8
District of Columbia100%0 of 10%$30.75884.7
Florida96%12 of 3633%$8.2925.1
Georgia98%10 of 4622%$13.0574.4
Hawaii95%3 of 475%$54.40193.8
Idaho83%2 of 729%$55.135924.2
Illinois100%6 of 1638%$89.02325.6
Indiana98%15 of 3247%$32.7263.8
Iowa96%5 of 956%$43.729715.5
Kansas100%4 of 1136%$6.6247.6
Kentucky84%9 of 3228%$9.21424.5
Louisiana95%2 of 1513%$19.2414.6
Maine99%1 of 333%$45.51497.1
Maryland88%5 of 771%$119.110744.1
Massachusetts13%1 of 176%$128.52858.9
Michigan99%9 of 1850%$83.5545.7
Minnesota93%19 of 3063%$58.645910.1
Mississippi93%3 of 2512%$16.52071.2
Missouri98%5 of 3216%$28.13111.4
Montana100%2 of 633%$22.04217.6
Nebraska53%1 of 119%$8.75524.4
Nevada100%2 of 450%$25.311888.8
New Hampshire78%4 of 4100%$79.92131.5
New Jersey91%1 of 520%$188.5548.6
New Mexico57%6 of 1060%$42.06361.5
New York75%4 of 1040%$73.810328.0
North Carolina98%20 of 4445%$25.78010.7
North Dakota89%5 of 1050%$0.28720.6
Ohio64%9 of 2733%$3.31205.3
Oklahoma100%3 of 2512%$34.513610.7
Oregon99%3 of 1916%$66.8927.0
Pennsylvania99%4 of 1331%$39.6713.7
Rhode Island0%0 of 10%$154.2034.1
South Carolina99%9 of 2635%$23.83014.1
South Dakota87%3 of 838%$43.83511.3
Tennessee96%5 of 559%$11.71670.0
Texas98%9 of 6115%$15.2559.7
Utah96%3 of 1225%$51.924162.9
Vermont97%3 of 3100%$116.72129.9
Virginia95%7 of 1741%$24.63217.8
Washington81%4 of 2814%$71.82417.2
West Virginia45%2 of 450%$2.613.9
Wisconsin94%15 of 1979%$31.2397.1
Wyoming86%3 of 743%$28.9010.8

Download state table as CSV

State smart-meter share adds the meters of utilities with 10,000+ residential meters. Spending and demand response are all reported amounts over all customers the state has in EIA's sales file.

Look up your utility

Choose your state and the company on your bill to see its four measures against the national median.

  • Loading.

What this means for you

  • With a smart meter your utility can see an outage and bill you by time of day. If your utility reports a low share, asking when meters will be replaced is a fair question.
  • Time-of-use rates charge different prices at different hours. Ask the utility for your own past usage by hour before switching.
  • Efficiency and demand-response programs often come with rebates or bill credits. If your utility spent little per customer, your state or a federal program may still offer help.
  • These are reported counts, not quality scores; a utility can rank low on one list and high on another.

Method, sources and dates

Source. EIA, Form EIA-861 annual electric power industry report, data year 2024, file eia861_2024.zip, retrieved 2026-10-01. Sheets used: Reliability, Sales to Ultimate Customers, Advanced Meters, Dynamic Pricing, Demand Response, Energy Efficiency, Net Metering, Operational Data. EIA publishes the utilities' own filings; we add nothing to a utility's figure.

State figures. A state figure is the average of the utilities' published numbers, weighted by the customers each utility reported next to them. Nothing is estimated. Only utilities that follow the IEEE 1366 standard are counted: EIA's form has a second block for utilities that use another method, and the two do not measure the same thing, so they are never added together. No utility reports in both blocks.

When a state gets a figure. The utilities that report under IEEE 1366 must serve at least 60% of the customers EIA lists for the state and at least 100,000 customers. Otherwise the state page shows the utilities and the reason, and the state is left out of rankings. Utility ranking floor: 10,000 customers; below that one bad day moves the average too far.

With and without major events. The comparison uses only utilities that published both numbers. One utility, Nashville Electric Service (Tennessee), published an all-events SAIDI of 0.0 against 86.6 minutes without major events, which cannot both be right; its all-events figure is dropped and its without-events figure kept. 82 of 102 state figures match EIA's own State Totals sheet within 1%. The rest differ, the largest being Tennessee and Mississippi; we have not traced which utilities EIA counted there, and we do not use that sheet.

Report card definitions. Utilities that sell without owning meters (third-party sellers) are left out. Smart meter share is residential AMI meters over all residential meters; time-based pricing is the residential flags and enrolled counts in the dynamic-pricing sheet; efficiency spending is customer incentives plus other costs over customers; demand response is actual peak savings over customers. Floors: 10,000 residential customers or meters, 10,000 customers.

State CSV, utility CSV.

Questions

Which utilities have the most smart meters?

803 utilities with 10,000+ residential meters are ranked. 684 have AMI on at least 90% of residential meters; the U.S. median is 100%.

How many utilities offer time-of-use pricing?

286 of the 890 utilities with 10,000+ residential customers report at least one time-based residential program. By type: cooperative 26% (119 of 453); municipal 18% (44 of 243); investor owned 75% (116 of 154).

Does a high efficiency spend mean lower bills?

Not by itself. The file reports spending and first-year savings, not bills.

Is there one overall grade?

No. The four measures describe different things and we do not weight them against each other.

Share this page

92% of U.S. residential meters were smart meters (AMI) in 2024; 286 of 890 utilities with 10,000+ residential customers offer a time-based rate

Cite this page

Underlying data are U.S. government works (EIA, Census Bureau). Our tables and charts: CC BY 4.0, credit Electric Consumer. The access date fills in when you open this page.

APA

Electric Consumer. (2026). Utility report card: smart meters, time-based rates, efficiency and demand response, 2024. Data as of 7 October 2026. Retrieved [date accessed], from https://electricconsumer.org/utility-report-card/

MLA

Electric Consumer. “Utility report card: smart meters, time-based rates, efficiency and demand response, 2024.” Electric Consumer, data as of 7 October 2026, https://electricconsumer.org/utility-report-card/index.html. Accessed [date accessed].

Chicago

Electric Consumer. “Utility report card: smart meters, time-based rates, efficiency and demand response, 2024.” Data as of 7 October 2026. Accessed [date accessed]. https://electricconsumer.org/utility-report-card/index.html.

BibTeX

@misc{usedata_utility_report_card_index,
  author = "Electric Consumer",
  title = {Utility report card: smart meters, time-based rates, efficiency and demand response, 2024},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://electricconsumer.org/utility-report-card/},
  note = {Data as of 7 October 2026. Accessed [date accessed]}
}
Embed this chart or number

Free to use. No tracking, no scripts. Each embed links back to this site.

Charts on this page (SVG)

Copies a self-contained SVG with the source and a link to this page inside the image.